The Iran MOU is Worse Than it Looks
What the US-Iran Memorandum Reveals About America’s Retreat from the Middle East.
Program Coordinator, Bill Graham Centre for Contemporary International History
Jack Cunningham is Fellow and Assistant Professor at Trinity College, University of Toronto, where he is also Program Coordinator at the Bill Graham Centre for Contemporary International History. He is a former editor of International Journal and has published on the conflict in Afghanistan, the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and Canadian nuclear history. He writes here in a purely personal capacity.
What the US-Iran Memorandum Reveals About America’s Retreat from the Middle East.
What Canada’s GlobalEye Decision Reveals About Defence in the Trump Era.
When the rules run out, who decides what counts as war.
Military strikes by American and Israeli forces have left Iran destabilized and uncertain about its future leadership, thus igniting a war of regime change.
Carney’s emerging foreign-policy doctrine emphasizes flexible coalitions among middle powers. But a closer look at Chrystia Freeland’s earlier vision raises a sharper question: are shared interests enough without shared democratic values?
It’s time for NATO members to take more concrete actions against Trump’s threats, which if continued will inevitably lead to the invocation of NATO’s Article Four.
Are we destined to find ourselves living in a less secure, less predictable, and less free international order?
Trump’s rejection of mutually beneficial interdependence has clarified that the US is no longer a reliable ally or trading partner.
While significant steps towards winding down the conflict have been taken, the final resolution of this intractable struggle will be harder than many are willing to acknowledge.
While Israel’s attack on Qatar did cross a diplomatic threshold, for Tel Aviv it was clearly worth the risk.