JOIN US

Woo: What’s the ultimate objective of Harper’s softer stance on China?

By: /
27 July, 2011

The idea of an “ultimate” objective is alien to most foreign policy discussions, and particularly so in the case of China, which is changing so fast.

At this stage, the most that can be said about Harper’s “softer” stance on China is that it strikes a more even balance between trade and human rights, and signals the heightened importance of China in Canadian foreign policy. Mr Baird has admirably conveyed these two messages in his recent visit to Beijing.

What is less clear is how Ottawa will develop the relationship. Is it principally about selling more to China? Balance notwithstanding, will there be a new approach to human rights? What about regional and global issues? Are there areas where Canada can have a “special relationship” with China? These are some of the important proximate questions.

Before you click away, we’d like to ask you for a favour … 

Journalism in Canada has suffered a devastating decline over the last two decades. Dozens of newspapers and outlets have shuttered. Remaining newsrooms are smaller. Nowhere is this erosion more acute than in the coverage of foreign policy and international news. It’s expensive, and Canadians, oceans away from most international upheavals, pay the outside world comparatively little attention.

At Open Canada, we believe this must change. If anything, the pandemic has taught us we can’t afford to ignore the changing world. What’s more, we believe, most Canadians don’t want to. Many of us, after all, come from somewhere else and have connections that reach around the world.

Our mission is to build a conversation that involves everyone — not just politicians, academics and policy makers. We need your help to do so. Your support helps us find stories and pay writers to tell them. It helps us grow that conversation. It helps us encourage more Canadians to play an active role in shaping our country’s place in the world.

Become a Supporter