JOIN US

Paris: Should the U.S. president have the right to kill American citizens when conducting counterterrorism operations?

By: /
8 February, 2013

The question is revealing because it appears to assume that targeted assassinations are merely problematic when they kill American citizens. Killing one’s own, so to speak, makes things infinitely worse, but under international law, the U.S. president does not have the right to target any person for direct assassination. The underlying question that needs to be asked is, what is the ongoing status of President Bush’s “war on terror.” Although President Obama let it be known that the “war” is over, he has effectively made it permanent with these secret drone assassinations.

Not too long ago it was understood that wartime enemies were to be captured; that killing these prisoners was a crime; and that even the worst of the worst deserved a fair trial (think Nazis and the Nuremberg Tribunal). The Obama administration’s “capture or kill” lists are euphemistic. Only the “kill” part is truly operative and that strikes me as a slippery-slope problem for the U.S. and all law-based democracies.

Before you click away, we’d like to ask you for a favour … 

Open Canada is published by the Canadian International Council, but that’s only the beginning of what the CIC does. Through its research and live events hosted by its 18 branches across the country, the CIC is dedicated to engaging Canadians from all walks of life in an ongoing conversation about Canada’s place in the world.

By becoming a member, you’ll be joining a community of Canadians who seek to shape Canada’s role in the world, and you’ll help Open Canada continue to publish thoughtful and provocative reporting and analysis.

Join us