Paris: Should Canada’s military support the intervention in Mali?

By: /
15 January, 2013
By: Erna Paris
Award-winning author, journalist, and historian

A tough question, given the failure of interventions elsewhere. Skeptics
will point to Afghanistan where the Taliban remains powerful after thousands
of coalition deaths and spent treasure.

But there is a difference. The Afghanistan intervention began as an attack
on Al Qaeda, but evolved into a confrontation with the indigenous Taliban.
Indigenous is the key word. The Taliban are at home in Afghanistan and have
never been displaced by a foreign power. Staying so long and pretending to
be winning was never a pragmatic choice for Western leaders.

At this moment, in Mali, it is the rapid influx of foreign Al Qaeda fighters
that must be stopped. State failure is imminent. Should that occur,
civilians will be further endangered and extremists will be able to launch
terrorist attacks at will, a dangerous turn. Canada and the West have an
immediate interest in blocking this take-over, as France has understood.
There is a small window of opportunity now. The Canadian government is right
to become (cautiously) involved.

Before you click away, we’d like to ask you for a favour … 

Open Canada is published by the Canadian International Council, but that’s only the beginning of what the CIC does. Through its research and live events hosted by its 18 branches across the country, the CIC is dedicated to engaging Canadians from all walks of life in an ongoing conversation about Canada’s place in the world.

By becoming a member, you’ll be joining a community of Canadians who seek to shape Canada’s role in the world, and you’ll help Open Canada continue to publish thoughtful and provocative reporting and analysis.

Join us