Listen Now

Newman: Should Canada treat its intellectual property as a national asset?

By: /
10 October, 2011
By: Don Newman
Chairman of Canada 2020, Senior Columnist with

Asking this question is to answer it. Of course we should! Under what conceivable construct should we not? There is no serious country in the world that does not consider its intellectual property a national asset.

 Everything from patents on scientific breakthroughs to copyrights on popular music is intellectual property. And all of it is an asset to the country which owns it.

Espionage in the 21st century is as much about stealing intellectual property as it is about defence and military strategy — although sometimes both are the same thing.

Obviously, intellectual property is a national asset. As such it should be development, nurtured and protected.

Before you click away, we’d like to ask you for a favour … 


Journalism in Canada has suffered a devastating decline over the last two decades. Dozens of newspapers and outlets have shuttered. Remaining newsrooms are smaller. Nowhere is this erosion more acute than in the coverage of foreign policy and international news. It’s expensive, and Canadians, oceans away from most international upheavals, pay the outside world comparatively little attention.

At Open Canada, we believe this must change. If anything, the pandemic has taught us we can’t afford to ignore the changing world. What’s more, we believe, most Canadians don’t want to. Many of us, after all, come from somewhere else and have connections that reach around the world.

Our mission is to build a conversation that involves everyone — not just politicians, academics and policy makers. We need your help to do so. Your support helps us find stories and pay writers to tell them. It helps us grow that conversation. It helps us encourage more Canadians to play an active role in shaping our country’s place in the world.

Become a Supporter