Listen Now

NATO’s Success in Libya

In Libya “not only was the worst avoided, but the result was a remarkable success,” says Paris.

By: /
31 October, 2011
Roland Paris
By: Roland Paris
Director, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Ottawa

NATO’s operation in Libya formally ends at midnight today. All told, its aircraft conducted almost 10,000 strike missions over 7 months. When the mission began, many commentators warned that the intervention would result in a quagmire that might draw in western forces into another endless, unwinnable war. No one could have predicted the outcome of this intervention: wars have a way of taking on their own dynamics, to the eternal dismay of military planners and politicians. In this case, however, not only was the worst avoided, but the result was a remarkable success.

Mark Lynch, associate professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University, sums up the success nicely:

The NATO intervention did save Libya’s protestors from a near-certain bloodbath in Benghazi. It did help Libyans free themselves from what was an extremely nasty, violent, and repressive regime. It did not lead to the widely predicted quagmire, the partition of Libya, the collapse of the TNC, or massive regional conflagration. It was fought under a real, if contestable, international legal mandate which enjoyed widespread Arab support.It did help to build — however imperfectly and selectively — an emerging international norm rejecting impunity for regimes which massacre their people.Libya’s success did inspire Arab democracy protestors across the region. And it did not result in an unpopular, long-term American military occupation which it would have never seemed prudent to withdraw.

Of course, now Libya’s interim government faces the daunting task of navigating the transition to a post-Qaddafi political system in a country that has no experience with democracy, significant regional and tribal differences, and semi-autonomous armed militias.

The international community’s message to Libya’s leaders today should be simple: “We respect and celebrate your declared intention to create a representative, tolerant government by, of and for the Libyan people – and we will do our best to help you realize this goal.” At the same time, however, such assistance should not amount to a blank check. Canada’s foreign minister John Baird, for one, has indicated that he will hold Libya’s government accountable for their pledges to respect human rights and work towards democratic governance. He was right to do so.

Photo courtesy of Reuters.

Before you click away, we’d like to ask you for a favour … 


Journalism in Canada has suffered a devastating decline over the last two decades. Dozens of newspapers and outlets have shuttered. Remaining newsrooms are smaller. Nowhere is this erosion more acute than in the coverage of foreign policy and international news. It’s expensive, and Canadians, oceans away from most international upheavals, pay the outside world comparatively little attention.

At Open Canada, we believe this must change. If anything, the pandemic has taught us we can’t afford to ignore the changing world. What’s more, we believe, most Canadians don’t want to. Many of us, after all, come from somewhere else and have connections that reach around the world.

Our mission is to build a conversation that involves everyone — not just politicians, academics and policy makers. We need your help to do so. Your support helps us find stories and pay writers to tell them. It helps us grow that conversation. It helps us encourage more Canadians to play an active role in shaping our country’s place in the world.

Become a Supporter