Macfarlane: Are the Liberal party’s calls for parliamentary oversight of Canada’s intelligence services warranted?

By: /
6 February, 2014
By: Emmett Macfarlane
Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Waterloo

One concern with the push for parliamentary oversight is the risk that it would actually cloud accountability. This may seem counter-intuitive, given that parliamentarians are elected representatives, but it becomes very difficult for opposition members of the House of Commons to hold the government to account for state activity that they themselves had input and possibly gave approval. In such a scenario, the responsible minister(s) may be able to deflect responsibility or blame by pointing to consensus that emerged within a parliamentary oversight committee.

Before you click away, we’d like to ask you for a favour … 

 

Journalism in Canada has suffered a devastating decline over the last two decades. Dozens of newspapers and outlets have shuttered. Remaining newsrooms are smaller. Nowhere is this erosion more acute than in the coverage of foreign policy and international news. It’s expensive, and Canadians, oceans away from most international upheavals, pay the outside world comparatively little attention.

At Open Canada, we believe this must change. If anything, the pandemic has taught us we can’t afford to ignore the changing world. What’s more, we believe, most Canadians don’t want to. Many of us, after all, come from somewhere else and have connections that reach around the world.

Our mission is to build a conversation that involves everyone — not just politicians, academics and policy makers. We need your help to do so. Your support helps us find stories and pay writers to tell them. It helps us grow that conversation. It helps us encourage more Canadians to play an active role in shaping our country’s place in the world.

Become a Supporter