Living in Glass Houses

Don’t fault the UN for international dysfunction – we’re all partially to blame says John Hancock.

By: /
5 October, 2012
By: John Hancock
Senior Counsellor at the World Trade Organization

Minister Baird, the Don Cherry of foreign policy, likes to shoot from the hip. His target this week was the feeble and feckless United Nations, which – he sternly lectured the General Assembly – “must spend less time looking at itself and more time focused on the problems that demand its attention.”

Fair point. But whose fault is that? It’s a convenient fiction that the UN somehow chooses to be ineffective – that it’s a kind of spoiled and bloated world government that refuses to act decisively on genocide, poverty, growth, and the many other pressing global problems demanding solutions. The reality, of course, is that the UN is neither more nor less than its member governments. If it has failed to deliver sufficient “results” – as Baird argues – then the responsibility lies squarely with national governments and their paralyzing inability to get along.

RELATED

A more honest speech would have decried the unraveling of global cooperation – on security, on finance, on trade, on the environment, you name it – and the dangerous signs that nations are turning ever-more inward and intolerant.

But, unfortunately, Canada is no longer in a strong position to deliver that message. This is the government that abandoned the Kyoto Accord because its international treaty commitments and the need for global environmental cooperation clashed inconveniently with its “Energy Superpower” ambitions and its failure to even try to reduce carbon emissions. This same government has offered little to break the negotiating deadlock in current global trade talks but has instead further fragmented the system by rushing into exclusionary bilateral deals and regional blocs.

As for investing ideas, energy, and political capital into helping the UN deliver the results that Baird demands, the prime minister chose to boycott the General Assembly yet again, instead using his New York visit to accept a humanitarian award from that great humanitarian, Henry Kissinger.

You have to admire the government’s audacity: slamming the UN for its ineffectiveness when its own actions, intentionally or not, serve to undermine it. But Canada is not alone. Sadly, it’s easier – and more politically rewarding – for most countries nowadays to blame the UN for the international system’s failings, rather than to take the hard decisions – and accept the tough compromises – needed to make the system work.

Still, if you are intent on living in a glass house, it’s probably wise not to throw too many stones.

Photo courtesy of Reuters

Before you click away, we’d like to ask you for a favour … 

 

Journalism in Canada has suffered a devastating decline over the last two decades. Dozens of newspapers and outlets have shuttered. Remaining newsrooms are smaller. Nowhere is this erosion more acute than in the coverage of foreign policy and international news. It’s expensive, and Canadians, oceans away from most international upheavals, pay the outside world comparatively little attention.

At Open Canada, we believe this must change. If anything, the pandemic has taught us we can’t afford to ignore the changing world. What’s more, we believe, most Canadians don’t want to. Many of us, after all, come from somewhere else and have connections that reach around the world.

Our mission is to build a conversation that involves everyone — not just politicians, academics and policy makers. We need your help to do so. Your support helps us find stories and pay writers to tell them. It helps us grow that conversation. It helps us encourage more Canadians to play an active role in shaping our country’s place in the world.

Become a Supporter