Kinsman: What is the biggest lesson Canada can take from its experience in Afghanistan?

By: /
30 April, 2012
Jeremy Kinsman
By: Jeremy Kinsman
CIC Distinguished Fellow

Being advocates immediately after 9/11 for NATO to go to Afghanistan was right. The US screwed everything up by diverting to invading Iraq. Canada’s hubris-driven decision to shift to a combat role in Kandahar was irresponsibly hasty, without evaluation of the readiness of NATO partners to take on equitable burden-sharing and rotation. We were naïve from Day One about negative Afghan cultural realities, Karzai, corruption, etc. Our low-end media reporting bought uncritically into Warrior Nation-type crap that the mission was about “killing scumbags.” The Conservative Government made our stake in Afghanistan the be-all and end-all of its “foreign policy” whose opportunity costs were everywhere else. Yet, while it’s hard to say how much capacity-building we contributed to unfortunate Afghans, we grew. Canadian professional military and civilian capabilities to operate in really difficult places were upgraded a lot, against lessons learned about the limits of intervention into complex, divided and emphatically distant societies.

Before you click away, we’d like to ask you for a favour … 


Open Canada is published by the Canadian International Council, but that’s only the beginning of what the CIC does. Through its research and live events hosted by its 18 branches across the country, the CIC is dedicated to engaging Canadians from all walks of life in an ongoing conversation about Canada’s place in the world.

By becoming a member, you’ll be joining a community of Canadians who seek to shape Canada’s role in the world, and you’ll help Open Canada continue to publish thoughtful and provocative reporting and analysis.

Join us