Kinsman: Was the first decade of the ICC a more just one?

By: /
16 April, 2012
Jeremy Kinsman
By: Jeremy Kinsman
CIC Distinguished Fellow

Selectively, and gradually, yes, for citizens from defeated states. But it looks too much like victor’s justice. The US hold-out obsession with ensuring its own citizens stay exempt from the Court’s jurisdiction and even reticence to cooperate with the court on evidence-finding has hobbled effectiveness in the inaugural decade, as well as tarnishing the whole principle of universal justice. (See Ignatieff on this in the New York Review, April 5.) The ICC itself was too wrapped up in securing judges’ emoluments for too long, at the expense of vigorous prosecution of crimes. But the ICC is at last no longer an experiment. Justice does have some traction if only the politics can be kept at bay. Let’s hope Obama’s second term ends US hypocrisy on this and brings them in.

Before you click away, we’d like to ask you for a favour … 


Journalism in Canada has suffered a devastating decline over the last two decades. Dozens of newspapers and outlets have shuttered. Remaining newsrooms are smaller. Nowhere is this erosion more acute than in the coverage of foreign policy and international news. It’s expensive, and Canadians, oceans away from most international upheavals, pay the outside world comparatively little attention.

At Open Canada, we believe this must change. If anything, the pandemic has taught us we can’t afford to ignore the changing world. What’s more, we believe, most Canadians don’t want to. Many of us, after all, come from somewhere else and have connections that reach around the world.

Our mission is to build a conversation that involves everyone — not just politicians, academics and policy makers. We need your help to do so. Your support helps us find stories and pay writers to tell them. It helps us grow that conversation. It helps us encourage more Canadians to play an active role in shaping our country’s place in the world.

Become a Supporter