Kinsman: How has Canada’s experience in Afghanistan changed Canadian foreign policy?

By: /
27 June, 2011
By: Jeremy Kinsman
Former ambassador to the European Union and high commissioner to Britain

Upside in capacity but downside in international behaviour.

Our Afghan experience built a well-kitted and combat-savvy military and civilian hands-on know-how. They can support humanitarian interventions in what will remain a violent world.

Downside? The Afghan operation shifted foreign policy calculations to the PMO/PCO, where there is zero interest in international opportunities without domestic political payback. Our press bubble on Canada’s Afghan engagement (foreign outlets hardly noticed us, covering only their own soldiers), pumped-up political patriotism that now deludes Canada even to oppose solo international health warnings on chrysotile asbestos, completing a picture of protecting dairy farmers, lauding a throwback seal hunt, and ducking answering for oil sands carbon emissions. These positions aimed at pleasing disparate fragments of Canada’s voting public form for the international professional community a composite national official personality that seems self-congratulatory and politically selfish. Can we recover positive internationalist energy and our place at the table?

Before you click away, we’d like to ask you for a favour … 

Open Canada is published by the Canadian International Council, but that’s only the beginning of what the CIC does. Through its research and live events hosted by its 18 branches across the country, the CIC is dedicated to engaging Canadians from all walks of life in an ongoing conversation about Canada’s place in the world.

By becoming a member, you’ll be joining a community of Canadians who seek to shape Canada’s role in the world, and you’ll help Open Canada continue to publish thoughtful and provocative reporting and analysis.

Join us