Jones: Canada should “make it a national priority to ensure we have the capacity to export our energy products beyond the US, and specifically to Asia.” Agree?

By: /
6 February, 2012

No. The international market for energy is expanding in multiple directions, and it’s a global market. Ultimately, it makes far less difference where Canada sells its energy, than at what price – and that’s driven by global demand, not specific markets. There’s a growing strand of energy nationalism, but it reflects deep misunderstandings of the way global energy markets work. Besides, when President Obama refused to bow to Congressional Republican pressure to fast-track the Keystone pipeline, he very deliberately opened a window to apply for a different route. It’s most certain that Keystone will eventually be approved – which from a Canadian economic perspective is good; from an environmental perspective – well, not so much.

Before you click away, we’d like to ask you for a favour … 

Journalism in Canada has suffered a devastating decline over the last two decades. Dozens of newspapers and outlets have shuttered. Remaining newsrooms are smaller. Nowhere is this erosion more acute than in the coverage of foreign policy and international news. It’s expensive, and Canadians, oceans away from most international upheavals, pay the outside world comparatively little attention.

At Open Canada, we believe this must change. If anything, the pandemic has taught us we can’t afford to ignore the changing world. What’s more, we believe, most Canadians don’t want to. Many of us, after all, come from somewhere else and have connections that reach around the world.

Our mission is to build a conversation that involves everyone — not just politicians, academics and policy makers. We need your help to do so. Your support helps us find stories and pay writers to tell them. It helps us grow that conversation. It helps us encourage more Canadians to play an active role in shaping our country’s place in the world.

Become a Supporter