Jones: Are drones a viable alternative to the F-35?

By: /
28 May, 2012

Drones are proving a useful (if legally somewhat problematic) tool in counter-terrorism. F-35s and similar air assets have been a useful tool in defeating organized government forces (to wit, Qaddafi’s army.) These are not the same problem. Drones can substitute for some portion of what F-35s do, and the other way around is not true; but they are different tools for different targets useful in different kinds of problems sets. The real question is, what kinds of threats does Canada/NATO think it’s going to be confronting? NATO has been maddeningly imprecise – or simply unrealistic – about that question. ‘Smart defense’ is the new name for coordinated, semi-shared procurement, and that’s fine as far as it goes; but it’s no substitute for genuine strategy, which NATO currently lacks.

Before you click away, we’d like to ask you for a favour … 

Journalism in Canada has suffered a devastating decline over the last two decades. Dozens of newspapers and outlets have shuttered. Remaining newsrooms are smaller. Nowhere is this erosion more acute than in the coverage of foreign policy and international news. It’s expensive, and Canadians, oceans away from most international upheavals, pay the outside world comparatively little attention.

At Open Canada, we believe this must change. If anything, the pandemic has taught us we can’t afford to ignore the changing world. What’s more, we believe, most Canadians don’t want to. Many of us, after all, come from somewhere else and have connections that reach around the world.

Our mission is to build a conversation that involves everyone — not just politicians, academics and policy makers. We need your help to do so. Your support helps us find stories and pay writers to tell them. It helps us grow that conversation. It helps us encourage more Canadians to play an active role in shaping our country’s place in the world.

Become a Supporter