Curtis: Should Canada treat its intellectual property as a national asset?

By: /
10 October, 2011
By: John Curtis
Adjunct Professor at Queen's University and Chair of Statistics Canada's Advisory Committee on International Trade Statistics

Yes, Canada should treat its intellectual property as both a national and an international asset in the interest of improving human health, achievement, and prosperity world-wide. A well-modulated intellectual property framework of policies, laws, regulations, and enforcement provisions are a necessary, although not sufficient, element of innovation and creativity to keep an economy such as Canada’s—and the world economy more generally—at the leading edge.

To make full use of intellectual property as an asset, other structural factors affecting potential supply of new and improved goods and services will have to be in place at the same time. These other factors include the degree of openness of various countries, the amount of competition in each economy and in the world more generally, tax policies, the quality and quantity of labour, the structure and amount of funding of research and development (R &D), relevant institutions, and, importantly, the willingness and capacity of each society to create and to adapt and absorb new ideas, technologies, cultural influences, and techniques.

Before you click away, we’d like to ask you for a favour … 


Open Canada is published by the Canadian International Council, but that’s only the beginning of what the CIC does. Through its research and live events hosted by its 18 branches across the country, the CIC is dedicated to engaging Canadians from all walks of life in an ongoing conversation about Canada’s place in the world.

By becoming a member, you’ll be joining a community of Canadians who seek to shape Canada’s role in the world, and you’ll help Open Canada continue to publish thoughtful and provocative reporting and analysis.

Join us