Copeland: What are the chances of Canada and ISAF leaving behind a functional Afghan defence force?

By:
Daryl Copeland
/
24 September, 2012
By: Daryl Copeland

Former diplomat; research fellow at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute

Most indications appear negative.

The disturbing surge in “blue on green” insider attacks does not bode well, and the resulting ISAF decision to suspend joint operations and limit shared military space suggests that the 2014 transfer plan is in serious trouble.

The echoes of the failed “Vietnamization” project are becoming more resonant.

The fundamental strategic misjudgment was the failure to recognize that most achievable objectives – dismantling the Al-Qaeda network, scattering its leadership, and removing the Taliban – had been realized by 2003.

That error is looking increasingly irrecoverable.

Before you click away, we’d like to ask you for a favour … 

 

Journalism in Canada has suffered a devastating decline over the last two decades. Dozens of newspapers and outlets have shuttered. Remaining newsrooms are smaller. Nowhere is this erosion more acute than in the coverage of foreign policy and international news. It’s expensive, and Canadians, oceans away from most international upheavals, pay the outside world comparatively little attention.

At Open Canada, we believe this must change. If anything, the pandemic has taught us we can’t afford to ignore the changing world. What’s more, we believe, most Canadians don’t want to. Many of us, after all, come from somewhere else and have connections that reach around the world.

Our mission is to build a conversation that involves everyone — not just politicians, academics and policy makers. We need your help to do so. Your support helps us find stories and pay writers to tell them. It helps us grow that conversation. It helps us encourage more Canadians to play an active role in shaping our country’s place in the world.

Become a Supporter