Copeland: Are the Liberal party’s calls for parliamentary oversight of Canada’s intelligence services warranted?

By: /
6 February, 2014
By: Daryl Copeland

Former diplomat; research fellow at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute

Canada’s intelligence services, although apparently not as out-of-control as their much larger U.S. and U.K. counterparts, would almost certainly benefit from greater parliamentary oversight and accountability.

According to ministerial briefing documents prepared for Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney and obtained by Embassy magazine under the Access to Information Act, serious gaps exist in the review structure that applies to national security agencies. In particular, “no standing body exists that can conduct integrated reviews of national security activities that cut across departments and agencies” and “some departments or agencies beyond the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, Communications Security Establishment Canada]and the RCMP have received additional national security responsibilities in recent years, but are not subject to corresponding increased levels of independent review.”

In a report submitted to Parliament on January 28, interim Privacy Commissioner Chantal Bernier made many of the same observations, and recommended:

  • bolstering the powers of the federal bodies reviewing national security operations

  • reforming existing privacy legislation to curb over-collection of private information and controlling its disclosure

  • providing a public status update on “consideration, rejection or implementation” of the Major and O’Connor reports

  • production of a white paper clarifying the mandates of Canada’s intelligence agencies and how they co-operate with global partners, as well as “lessons learned” from the O’Connor, Iacobucci and Major reports.

It is not clear what impact – if any – acceptance of these recommendations would have on existing intelligence-sharing agreements with Canada’s partners in the “Five Eyes” group (U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia, N.Z.) or beyond. But given the dearth of convincing evidence to the effect that intrusive cyber-surveillance has significantly improved either public safety or national security, heightened scrutiny and greater transparency appear to be in order.

In the current political environment, civil liberties and constitutional rights require constant vigilance and active defence.

We are all much in Edward Snowden’s debt.

Before you click away, we’d like to ask you for a favour … 


Journalism in Canada has suffered a devastating decline over the last two decades. Dozens of newspapers and outlets have shuttered. Remaining newsrooms are smaller. Nowhere is this erosion more acute than in the coverage of foreign policy and international news. It’s expensive, and Canadians, oceans away from most international upheavals, pay the outside world comparatively little attention.

At Open Canada, we believe this must change. If anything, the pandemic has taught us we can’t afford to ignore the changing world. What’s more, we believe, most Canadians don’t want to. Many of us, after all, come from somewhere else and have connections that reach around the world.

Our mission is to build a conversation that involves everyone — not just politicians, academics and policy makers. We need your help to do so. Your support helps us find stories and pay writers to tell them. It helps us grow that conversation. It helps us encourage more Canadians to play an active role in shaping our country’s place in the world.

Become a Supporter